| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
The Nerve > Volume 10(2); 2024 > Article
Ha, Moon, Kim, Kim, Park, Chin, Cho, Kim, and Jang: Is the Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament a Positive Factor for the Fusion after Posterior Cervical Fusion and Decompression?

Abstract

Objective

Multilevel posterior cervical fusion (PCF) and decompression surgery is a viable treatment option for multilevel ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and spondylotic myelopathy. Since OPLL is known to affect bone formation, this study aimed to examine the effect of OPLL on the incidence of pseudarthrosis following PCF in a cohort study.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with PCF and laminectomy at our institution. This study included patients who underwent C3 to C6 posterior fusion surgery involving lateral mass screw fixation without anterior surgery for OPLL or spondylotic myelopathy. Fusion status was evaluated 1 year postoperatively with computed tomography. Bone mineral density (BMD) and sagittal parameters were also evaluated as potential contributing factors to the fusion rate.

Results

Eighty patients were included. Pseudarthrosis was observed in 22.5% (n=18) of patients. Pseudarthrosis incidence was lower in patients with OPLL (spondylosis vs. OPLL, 33.3% vs. 12.2%; p=0.003), and a higher BMD T-score (pseudarthrosis vs. fusion, -1.9 ± 0.7 vs. -0.6 ± 1.3; p<0.01), a larger preoperative range of motion (ROM) (26.7 ± 13.3 vs. 17.6 ± 10.9; p=0.01), and a greater preoperative-to-postoperative decrease in cervical lordosis (-8.1 ± 7.9 vs. -2.7 ± 7.9; p<0.01). Pseudarthrosis was associated with worsening neck pain after surgery.

Conclusion

The absence of OPLL, lower BMD, larger preoperative ROM, and a greater decrease in postoperative cervical lordosis were identified as risk factors for pseudarthrosis after multiple PCF.

INTRODUCTION

Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and degenerative spondylosis are common causes of myelopathy, and posterior cervical fusion (PCF) is one of the most widely performed procedures when multilevel treatment is necessary with laminoplasty and anterior cervical fusion surgery3,13,15). The reported incidence of pseudarthrosis in PCF ranges from 3.5% to 28%9,12). However, contrary to cases in lumbar fusion surgery and anterior cervical fusion surgery, the clinical significance of pseudarthrosis in PCF is frequently underrated. As interest in posterior cervicothoracic deformity surgery increases and with a better understanding of the PCF procedure, various factors such as bone mineral density (BMD) and several radiologic parameters that affect the fusion rate in PCF have been reported to date. OPLL is an abnormal lesion caused by heterotrophic OPLL and can lead to cord compression via narrowing of the spinal canal10,14). However, it is known that the genes involved in OPLL formation, such as COL6A1, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), and transforming growth factor-β, also play key roles in bone formation and maintaining collagen structure and bone equilibrium5). Thus, in this study, we hypothesized that the presence of OPLL may positively support fusion in PCF and sought to determine if the presence of OPLL influences the fusion rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Patient Selection

This research is a retrospective cohort study that was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institution. Patients included in the study were those with myelopathy symptoms with modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score of less than 17 and three or more lesion points in the cervical spine due to cervical OPLL or spondylosis, thus requiring PCF surgery. From 2011 to 2019, we examined patients who underwent lateral mass screw fixation (LMSF) C3 to C6 and decompression surgery. We also included patients who had radiographs (including dynamic X-ray and computed tomography [CT]) performed at 12 months post-surgery. Exclusion criteria were patients who had previously undergone other cervical surgeries; patients who received concurrent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); patients with cervical deformity (C2-7) sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle <10° or >25°, T1-slope-cervical lordosis >15°, according to criteria by Ames et al.1), pathological, infectious, or traumatic conditions; patients with incomplete medical records; and patients who used fusion assist materials such as BMP or demineralized bone matrix.

2. Surgical Procedures

Surgeries were performed in a prone position under general anesthesia. From C3 to C6, the entry site was set 1 mm medial to the center of the lateral mass, and screws were inserted 25 degrees superolateral to the entry point using the Magerl technique. All decompressions were carried out with total laminectomy at the fixation points (C3-6), followed by fixation using rods and set screws. Posterolateral fusion was performed by decorticating the lateral mass and using only autologous chips obtained from laminectomy. Postoperatively, a semi-rigid neck collar was worn for three months.

3. Radiological Measurement

By examining medical records, patient information was obtained. OPLL was defined as heterotrophic OPLL thicker than 2 mm Anteroposterior, lateral, flexion-extension radiographs and CT scans were reviewed for radiological evaluation. Using imaging software (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Centricity Enterprise Web V 3.0), all radiologic parameters were measured. The C2-7 angle was defined as the cervical lordosis angle (cervical lordosis, angle subtended by lines drawn along the posterior vertebral bodies of C2 and C7). Then, the C2-7 range of motion (ROM) was calculated as the difference between the angles formed by the C2 and C7 vertebrae during cervical extension and flexion. The distance between the C2 plumb line and the posterior C7 upper endplate was defined as the C2-7 SVA. Pseudarthrosis was defined as the absence of radiographic ossification of all fusion surfaces, a radiolucent gap around the hardware, or the presence of instrument failure in one year postoperative CT scan (Fig. 1, 2). Solid fusion was determined based on bone bridge formation and minimal segmental motion on dynamic X-ray (Fig. 3, 4).

4. Clinical Outcome

We measured the mJOA score, neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score for neck pain before and at one year postoperatively.

5. Statistical Analysis

The radiologic and clinical data of the groups were compared using the student’s t-test and the χ2 test. The descriptive data are shown as the mean standard deviation. The Fisher's exact test was utilized to compare proportional data with small occurrences, such as disease type. All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS (version 25.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with a significance level of p-value less than 0.05 for all analyses. In addition, the odds ratio (OR) was calculated for dichotomous variables to describe the strength of the relationship between the risk factors and pseudarthrosis. Multivariate logistic regression models for pseudarthrosis were developed to investigate the relative contributions of the risk factors.

RESULTS

1. Comparison of the Fusion and Pseudarthrosis Groups (Table 1-3)

Eighty patients were included in this study (39 patients with spondylosis, and 41 patients with OPLL (Table 1). There were no significant differences in sex, age, or BMD between the patients with spondylosis and the patients with OPLL. However, patients with OPLL have smaller ROM (15.9 ± 10.5°) than patients with spondylosis (23.5 ± 12.3°; p=0.004). One year after surgery, 18 patients (22.5%) showed pseudarthrosis and belonged to the pseudarthrosis group, while 62 belonged to the fusion group. At two years follow-up of the pseudarthrosis group, 3 patients showed fusion, 8 patients still showed pseudarthosis and 7 were lost for follow-up. The mean age was 67.2 ± 10.6 years in the pseudarthrosis group and 67.7 ± 9.7 years in the fusion group (p=0.855). However, BMD T-score was significantly lower in the pseudarthrosis group (-1.9 ± 0.7) compared to the fusion group (-0.6 ± 1.3; p=0.003) and the incidence of pseudarthrosis was lower in patients with OPLL than in patients with only spondylosis (OPLL vs. spondylosis, 12.2% vs. 33.3%; p=0.024) (Table 2). Segment by segment analysis of fusion rate in pseudarthrosis group showed that pseudarthrosis occurred mostly in the C5-6 segment (Table 3).

2. Comparison of Radiologic Parameters (Table 4)

The preoperative C2-7 ROM and change in cervical lordosis after surgery were greater in the pseudarthrosis group compared to the fusion group (pseudarthrosis vs. fusion, C2-7 ROM, 26.7 ± 13.3° vs. 17.6 ± 10.9°; p=0.004; change of cervical lordosis after surgery, -8.1 ± 7.9° vs. -2.7 ± 7.9°; p=0.013). There were no significant differences between the two groups in preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis and C2-7 SVA.

3. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes (Table 4)

While preoperative VAS, NDI, and mJOA scores and 1-year postoperative NDI and mJOA scores did not differ significantly between the two groups, the 1-year postoperative neck VAS score was higher in the pseudarthrosis group (3.3 ± 0.9) than in the fusion group (2.2 ± 0.9; p<0.001). However, no patients required revision surgery due to pseudarthrosis.

4. Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis (Table 5)

In the univariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for pseudarthrosis, absence of OPLL (OR, 3.600 [1.142-11.348]; p=0.029), lower BMD (OR, 0.528 [0.312-0.894]; p=0.018), larger preoperative cervical ROM (OR, 1.069 [1.017-1.124]; p=0.009), and a larger decrease in postoperative cervical lordosis (OR, 1.097 [1.017-1.183]; p=0.017) were found to increase the OR. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, three variables were found to significantly predict pseudarthrosis: Absence of OPLL (OR, 11.192 [1.114-112.451]; p=0.04), lower BMD (OR, 0.198 [0.064-0.618]; p=0.005), and a larger decrease in postoperative cervical lordosis (OR, 1.222 [1.009-1.480]; p=0.041).

DISCUSSION

In this study, pseudarthrosis occurred in 22.5% of cases. The reported rates of pseudarthrosis in PCF range from 3.5% to 28%, with an average of 4.8%. Our findings align with those in the literature4). Pseudarthrosis is a significant complication that affects clinical outcomes, such as the need for revision surgery. Associated risk factors of cervical fusion surgery reported to date include low BMD T-scores, a larger number of fused vertebrae, large preoperative C2-7 SVA, and low cervical lordosis10,25).
Previous studies by Sohn and Chung19), Yamauchi et al.22) have demonstrated that OPLL patients have a higher BMD than their counterparts. Furthermore, Hyun et al.6) reported that in patients who underwent laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy, patients with OPLL showed greater postoperative decrease in ROM, which may be attributed to greater spontaneous laminar fusion. Our study's primary objective was to determine whether the presence of OPLL itself influences the fusion rate. In our study, patients with OPLL showed a statistically significantly higher fusion rate compared to patients without OPLL.
High levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in serum may indicate that inflammation can influence the progression of OPLL, according to a study by Kawaguchi et al.7). In addition, serum concentrations of the formation regulator, periostin, were found to be elevated and numerous investigations have reported results suggesting a genetic link to ectopic bone formation in ligaments17,21,24). We postulate that such factors may have contributed to a greater fusion rate in OPLL. In this study, we also found lower BMD as a significant predictor of pseudarthrosis using multivariate logistic regression. Despite the fact that OPLL patients tend to have higher BMD and lower pseudarthrosis rates, our study helped establish that the presence of OPLL may serve as an independent factor contributing to increased fusion rate in PCF8,16,22).
Larger preoperative ROM or larger decreases in cervical lordosis were also found to be associated with pseudarthrosis. Specifically, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that these are risk factors for pseudarthrosis. Choi et al.2) reported that a substantial preoperative ROM is associated with pseudarthrosis in ACDF, it is less clear whether ROM is a risk factor in PCF2). We hypothesize that this is a result of the residual anterior disc motion that persists after fixation of the posterior element and the facet joint potentially interfering with fusion. In our study, patients with OPLL had a smaller ROM compared to patients without OPLL. This may be because some patients experienced a reduction in ROM due to partial fusion caused by OPLL. However, in the multivariate logistic regression test, larger ROM was not an independent risk factor of the pseudarthrosis. Several studies have reported correlations between mechanical failure and cervical deformities in terms of T1 slope, cervical lordosis, and SVA10,18). A significant decrease in cervical lordosis was observed in the pseudarthrosis group, suggesting a correlation between cervical imbalance and pseudarthrosis due to mechanical failure. In our study, there was an increased risk of pseudarthrosis in cases where there is an absence of OPLL, a larger preoperative ROM in the cervical spine, an anticipated postoperative increase in the SVA, or low BMD. In such patients' surgeries, surgeons should consider rigorous osteoporosis treatment and additional surgeries such as ACDF or pedicle screw fixation rather than LMSF only. In clinical comparisons, we observed higher postoperative VAS scores for the neck in the pseudarthrosis group, suggesting that pseudarthrosis may affect patients' neck pain.
The retrospective design and limited sample size of this study may hinder the generalizability of its findings. Future study is required to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and the influence of interventions on these risk factors on the fusion rate. It has also been argued that OPLLs should be categorized into continuous and segmental types, depending on whether they are genetic or not21). Continuous (including mixed) type OPLL is reported to have higher expression of the endochondral ossification gene encoding osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, and type I collagen than segmental (including localized) type, so it grows faster and has a different age of onset11,20,23,24). Future studies on the fusion of OPLLs may yield more meaningful results if genetic factors are also considered.

CONLUCSION

In conclusion, our study found that an absence of OPLL, lower BMD, larger changes in cervical lordosis, and larger preoperative cervical ROM were significant predictors of pseudarthrosis. These findings may help in better patient selection and preoperative planning, as well as in providing appropriate patient counseling regarding the risks and benefits of the procedure.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
Illustrative case of pseudarthrosis after posterior cervical fusion and decompression. (A) Anteroposterior view X-ray. (B) Sagittal view computed tomography (CT) scan. (C) Axial view CT scan. The X-ray shows a peri-screw halo, and the CT scan shows a lack of bone bridge formation at the C5-6 segment, suggesting pseudarthrosis.
nerve-2024-00584f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Illustrative case of pseudarthrosis after posterior cervical fusion and decompression. (A) Lateral view X-ray, flexion. (B) Lateral view X-ray, extension. The dynamic X-ray shows a change of approximately 14° in the Cobb angle, suggesting non-union.
nerve-2024-00584f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Illustrative case of solid fusion after posterior cervical fusion and decompression. (A) Lateral view X-ray. (B) Sagittal view computed tomography (CT) scan. (C) Coronal view CT scan. The X-ray and CT scan show bone bridge formation and no evidence of a peri-screw halo.
nerve-2024-00584f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Illustrative case of solid fusion after posterior cervical fusion and decompression. (A) Lateral view X-ray, flexion. (B) Lateral view X-ray, extension. The dynamic X-ray shows minimal segmental motion.
nerve-2024-00584f4.jpg
Table 1.
Comparisons of demographic characteristics between the OPLL and spondylosis groups
Spondylosis (n = 39) OPLL (n = 41) p-value
Sex 0.155
 Female 32 (82.1) 28 (68.3)
 Male 7 (17.9) 13 (31.7)
Age (years) 66.7 ± 10.2 68.4 ± 9.6 0.439
Fusion level 0.518
 3 28 (71.8) 32 (78.0)
 4 11 (28.2) 9 (22.0)
BMD (T-score) -0.9 ± 1.1 -0.7 ± 1.5 0.465

The data is presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

OPLL: ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; BMD: bone mineral density.

Table 2.
Comparison of the fusion and pseudarthrosis groups
Pseudarthrosis (n = 18) Fusion (n = 62) p-value
Sex 0.536
 Female 6 (30) 14 (70)
 Male 12 (20) 48 (80)
Age (years) 67.2 ± 10.6 67.7 ± 9.7 0.855
Fusion level 0.536
 3 15 (25) 45 (75)
 4 3 (15) 17 (85)
Disease 0.024*
 Spondylosis 13 (33.3) 26 (67.7)
 OPLL 5 (12.2) 36 (87.8)
BMD (T-score) -1.9 ± 0.7 -0.6 ± 1.3 0.003*

The data is presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

OPLL: ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; BMD: bone mineral density.

*p < 0.05, statistically significant difference.

Table 3.
Comparison of fusion by segment in the pseudarthrosis group
Segment Pseudarthrosis (n = 18) p-value
C3-4 0.005*
 Non-union 3 (16.7)
 Fusion 15 (83.3)
C4-5 <0.001*
 Non-union 1 (5.6)
 Fusion 17 (94.4)
C5-6 NA
 Non-union 18 (100.0)
 Fusion 0 (0.0)

The data is presented as number (%). The p-value for C5-6 is not available, as there were no cases of fusion in this segment.

NA: not available.

*p < 0.05, statistically significant difference.

Table 4.
Comparison of radiologic parameters and clinical outcomes between the fusion and pseudarthrosis groups
Pseudarthrosis (n = 18) Fusion (n = 62) p-value
Radiologic parameters
C2-7 lordosis (°)
 Preoperative 10.8 ± 11.4 7.1 ± 12.1 0.249
 1 year postoperative 2.7 ± 10.2 4.2 ± 11.1 0.598
 Change in C2-7 lordosis -8.1 ± 7.9 -2.7 ± 7.9 0.013*
Preoperative C2-7 range of motion (°) 26.7 ± 13.3 17.6 ± 10.9 0.004*
C2-7 SVA (mm)
 Preoperative 16.8 ± 11.5 20.4 ± 11.4 0.237
 1 year postoperative 16.9 ± 8.9 22.9 ± 12.8 0.07
 Change in C2-7 SVA 0.2 ± 9.5 2.4 ± 9.2 0.363
Clinical outcomes
mJOA
 Preoperative 12.7 ± 1.8 12.8 ± 1.9 0.842
 1 year postoperative 15.3 ± 1.4 15.1 ± 1.6 0.631
 Change in mJOA 2.6 ± 1.5 2.3 ± 1.7 0.49
NDI
 Preoperative 26.8 ± 8.1 27.8 ± 7.3 0.627
 1 year postoperative 20.5 ± 6.4 20.3 ± 6.2 0.916
 Change in NDI 6.3 ± 5.8 7.5 ± 4.1 0.44
Neck VAS score
 Preoperative 3.9 ± 1.0 3.5 ± 1.1 0.122
 1 year postoperative 3.3 ± 0.9 2.2 ± 0.9 <0.001*
 Change in neck VAS 0.6 ± 1.1 1.3 ± 1.4 0.051

The data is presented as mean ± standard deviation.

SVA: sagittal vertical axis; mJOA: modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association; NDI: neck disability index; VAS: visual analogue scale.

*p < 0.05, statistically significant difference.

Table 5.
Analysis of the factors related to pseudarthrosis after posterior cervical fixation using logistic regression
Univariate logistic regression Multiple logistic regression
OR (95% CI) p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value
Age (years) 0.995 (0.943-1.049) 0.853
Sex (male/female) 1.714 (0.545-5.396) 0.357
Smoking 0.231 (0.016-3.350) 0.283
Diabetes 2.399 (0.545-10.552) 0.247
BMI 0.964 (0.755-1.231) 0.769
Disease
 OPLL 1
 Spondylosis 3.600 (1.142-11.348) 0.029* 11.192 (1.114-112.451) 0.04*
BMD (T-score) 0.528 (0.312-0.894) 0.018* 0.198 (0.064-0.618) 0.005*
C2-7 lordosis (°)
 Preoperative 1.027 (0.982-1.075) 0.247
 1 year postoperative 0.987 (0.940-1.036) 0.593
 Change in C2-7 lordosis 1.097 (1.017-1.183) 0.017* 1.222 (1.009-1.480) 0.041*
Preoperative C2-7 range of motion (°) 1.069 (1.017-1.124) 0.009* 0.958 (0.878-1.045) 0.332
C2-7 SVA (mm)
 Preoperative 0.966 (0.912-1.023) 0.24
 1 year postoperative 0.942 (0.882-1.006) 0.073
 Change in C2-7 SVA 0.972 (0.915-1.033) 0.359

The data is presented as mean ± standard deviation.

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; OPLL: ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; BMD: bone mineral density; SVA: sagittal vertical axis.

*p < 0.05, statistically significant difference.

REFERENCES

1. Ames CP, Smith JS, Eastlack R, Blaskiewicz DJ, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, et al.: Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system. J Neurosurg Spine 23:673-683, 2015
crossref pmid
2. Choi SH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Gwak HW, Lee DH: Preoperative radiographic parameters to predict a higher pseudarthrosis rate after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:1772-1778, 2017
crossref pmid
3. Epstein N: Ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament: A review. Neurosurg Focus 13:Ecp1, 2002
crossref
4. Finkelstein JA, Stark RB, Lee J, Schwartz CE: Patient factors that matter in predicting spine surgery outcomes: A machine learning approach. J Neurosurg Spine 35:127-136, 2021
crossref pmid
5. Head J, Rymarczuk G, Stricsek G, Velagapudi L, Maulucci C, Hoelscher C, et al.: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Surgical approaches and associated complications. Neurospine 16:517-529, 2019
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC, Roh SW, Kang SH, Riew KD: The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: A prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1134-1139, 2009
crossref pmid
7. Kawaguchi Y, Nakano M, Yasuda T, Seki S, Suzuki K, Yahara Y, et al.: Serum biomarkers in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): Inflammation in OPLL. PLoS One 12:e0174881, 2017
crossref pmid
8. Kim KW, Oh YM, Eun JP: Increased prevalence of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and increased bone mineral density in patients with ossification of nuchal ligament. Korean J Spine 13:139-143, 2016
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Labrum JTt, Khan I, Archer KR, Abtahi AM, Stephens BF: 2nd: Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in posterior cervical fusion: Does cervicothoracic junction lowest instrumented vertebra predict mechanical failure? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46:E482-E490, 2021
crossref pmid
10. Lafage R, Smith JS, Soroceanu A, Ames C, Passias P, Shaffrey C, et al.: Predicting mechanical failure following cervical deformity surgery: A composite score integrating age-adjusted cervical alignment targets. Global Spine J 13:2432-2438, 2023
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Lee CH, Kim KT, Kim CH, Lee EY, Lee SG, Seo ME, et al.: Unveiling the genetic variation of severe continuous/mixed-type ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament by whole-exome sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Spine J 21:1847-1856, 2021
crossref pmid
12. Leven D, Cho SK: Pseudarthrosis of the cervical spine: Risk factors, diagnosis and management. Asian Spine J 10:776-786, 2016
crossref pmid pmc
13. Li C, Mei Y, Li L, Li Z, Huang S: Posterior decompression and fusion with vertical pressure procedure in the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL with kyphotic deformity. Orthop Surg 14:2361-2368, 2022
crossref pmid pmc
14. Li C, Xie B, Chen S, Lin G, Yang G, Zhang L: The effect of local bone density on mechanical failure after internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:223-232, 2016
crossref pdf
15. Li C, Zhou H, Yang S, Zhu X, Zha G, Yang Z, et al.: Effect of K-line on posterior cervical surgery in patients with posterior longitudinal ligament ossification. Eur Spine J 29:2368-2377, 2020
crossref pmid pdf
16. Morio Y, Yamamoto K, Kishimoto H, Hagino H, Kuranobu K, Kagawa T: Bone mineral density of the radius in patients with ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. A longitudinal study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:2513-2516, 1993
crossref pmid
17. Nakajima M, Takahashi A, Tsuji T, Karasugi T, Baba H, Uchida K, et al.: A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Nat Genet 46:1012-6, 2014
crossref pmid pdf
18. Passfall L, Williamson TK, Krol O, Lebovic J, Imbo B, Joujon-Roche R, et al.: Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity? J Neurosurg Spine 37:368-375, 2022
crossref pmid
19. Sohn S, Chung CK: Increased bone mineral density and decreased prevalence of osteoporosis in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a case-control study. Calcif Tissue Int 92:28-34, 2013
crossref pmid pdf
20. Wei W, He HL, Chen CY, Zhao Y, Jiang HL, Liu WT, et al.: Whole exome sequencing implicates PTCH1 and COL17A1 genes in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine in Chinese patients. Genet Mol Res 13:1794-804, 2014
crossref pmid
21. Won YI, Lee CH, Yuh WT, Kwon SW, Kim CH, Chung CK: Genetic odyssey to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine: A systematic review. Neurospine 19:299-306, 2022
crossref pmid pmc pdf
22. Yamauchi T, Taketomi E, Matsunaga S, Sakou T: Bone mineral density in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Bone Miner Metab 17:296-300, 1999
crossref pmid pdf
23. Yang HS, Lu XH, Chen DY, Yuan W, Yang LL, Chen Y, et al.: Mechanical strain induces Cx43 expression in spinal ligament fibroblasts derived from patients presenting ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 20:1459-1465, 2011
crossref pmid pmc pdf
24. Yang HS, Lu XH, Chen DY, Yuan W, Yang LL, He HL, et al.: Upregulated expression of connexin43 in spinal ligament fibroblasts derived from patients presenting ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2267-274, 2011
crossref pmid
25. Yoo SJ, Park JY, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE, Kim KH: Predictive risk factors for mechanical complications after multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 38:165-173, 2023
crossref pmid
Editorial Office
Department of Neurosurgery, Dankook University Hospital
201, Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do 31116, South Korea
TEL: +0082-41-550-6280   FAX: +82-41-556-0524   
E-mail: spine1225@naver.com , mousehunt7@naver.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Peripheral Nervous System.                 Developed in M2PI