| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
The Nerve > Volume 10(2); 2024 > Article
Kim and Kim: Supraclavicular Approach for the Treatment of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Due to Cervical Rib: A Case Report

Abstract

Cervical rib (CR) refers to congenital bone growth in the seventh cervical bone, which can cause thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Since TOS has various etiologies, physical and radiological examinations are necessary for a proper diagnosis. We report a case of an 18-year-old female patient in whom CR-induced neurogenic TOS was treated using a supraclavicular surgical approach. For the surgical treatment of neurogenic TOS due to CR, it is recommended to use a supraclavicular approach that allows a good view of the surrounding structures, such as the brachial plexus.

INTRODUCTION

Cervical ribs (CR) refer to ribs congenitally growing from the seventh cervical vertebrae7). CR occurs in approximately 1% of the population and is more common in women than men7). Most CRs are asymptomatic; however, 10% cause thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS)14). If TOS due to CR does not improve with conservative treatment, surgery should be considered14).
TOS is divided into subtypes depending on the structure that compresses it, such as vascular TOS, which compresses arteries or veins, and neurogenic TOS, which compresses nerves8). Most venous TOS compress the subclavian vein, and rare arterial TOS compress the subclavian artery7). Vascular TOS usually causes edema and pain in the arms and shoulders. Meanwhile, arterial TOS may not cause radicular pain or numbness. In severe cases, cyanosis may occur with a reduced pulse in the upper limbs15). Most cases of TOS are neurogenic, and less than 5% are vascular1). Neurogenic TOS presents with paresthesia, numbness, and motor weakness11).
Herein, we report a case of a patient with a palpable mass in the neck for 3 years and had a tingling sensation in the right arm after 1 year. Radiological examination revealed that CR was compressing the brachial plexus. The patient was successfully treated for CR-induced neurogenic TOS using a supraclavicular surgical approach.

CASE REPORT

An 18-year-old female presented with a supraclavicular palpable mass 3 years ago and visited an otolaryngology outpatient clinic. For the first time, the C7 rib was discovered (Fig. 1A). Computed tomography (CT) angiography performed 6 months later showed pseudoarticulation between the cervical and first ribs (Fig. 1B, C). The patient started experiencing paresthesia in the C7 dermatome of the right arm after 1 year but had no motor weakness.
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brachial plexus with enhancement showed that the middle and inferior trunks of the right brachial plexus were compressed between the articulation site of the CR and the anterior scalene muscle (Fig. 2A-D). Also, edema of the middle and inferior trunks of the brachial plexus was suspected (Fig. 2A, C, D). Medication was started for pain control, but there was no improvement in symptoms. Therefore, surgery is recommended. However, as the patient was about to take a college entrance exam, she continued medication treatment and eventually used narcotic analgesics because of severe pain. Surgical treatment can be performed only after a few months.
After general endotracheal anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring was performed to check the somatosensory and motor-evoked signals. The patient was placed in the supine position, and the supraclavicular area was exposed by placing a large roll under the cervical and thoracic spines, with the head turned in the opposite direction.
An incision was made in the supraclavicular fossa (Fig. 3A). We performed a careful dissection of the tissues and muscular, vascular, and nervous structures. First, we identified the omohyoid muscle and the lateral portion of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Under these conditions, the phrenic nerve was observed on the anterior surface of the scalene muscle, and we found the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. After anterior scalenectomy, we identified the long thoracic nerve, the middle trunk of the brachial plexus, and the subclavian artery (Fig. 3B). The brachial plexus was carefully retracted to reveal the C7 CR posteriorly (Fig. 3C). Finally, the CR was dissected from the proximal end to the distal end and was removed using a longueur, drill, and bone scalpel.
After the operation, the C7 CR was completely removed, as seen on the cervical X-ray (Fig. 4). Immediately after the surgery, the patient's symptoms gradually improved. Radiating pain was decreased, and she was discharged from the hospital on the 15th postoperative day. Symptoms recovered within 2 months after surgery.

DISCUSSION

TOS is caused by nerve or blood vessel compression of the bone or soft tissue in the thoracic outlet space21). According to Atasoy2), TOS is caused by 70% soft tissue and 30% by bony structures. Between 30% and 50% of the soft tissue causes variations in the scalene muscles, compressing the structures within the interscalene triangle11). In addition, soft tissue causes include anomalous ligaments or bands and tumors. Among the causes of bone structure, the CR was the most common. Meanwhile, the fractures of the prominent C7 transverse process and first rib were the second most common. In addition, damage or dislocation of the joint connected to the clavicle and osseous tumors are also related.
Since the diagnosis of TOS is difficult, appropriate examinations and imaging workup are necessary7). For physical examination, the elevated arm stress test (EAST), the upper limb tension test (ULTT), the Adson test, the 90° abduction/external rotation stress test (90 AER), and costoclavicular or Halsted tests were used16). For the EAST, the patient's arms were abducted slightly behind the head at 90°, and the elbows were flexed at 90°. Subsequently, if the patient repeatedly holds and stretches his/her hand for approximately 3 min and the symptoms aggravate, it is a positive response. The ULTT extends both arms 90° with elbow extension, both wrists are dorsiflexed downward and the head is tilted in the opposite direction. If pain or paresthesia occurs, the response is positive. The Adson test involves turning the patient's head toward the symptomatic side, extending the neck, and inhaling deeply. A positive response is observed when the radial pulse disappears6). The 90 AER test opens the arm at 90° in external rotation. If symptoms appear, it is a positive response7). The costoclavicular or Halsted test is in which the patient lowers the shoulder backward and downward6).
Although these tests are widely used, imaging studies are required because of their high false-positive rates7). Ultrasonography can be used to image the axillary and supraclavicular areas. It is also useful for checking vascular compression using Doppler imaging and examining the brachial plexus17). However, if the patient is obese or if the bone overlaps the examination area, the examination is limited12). Angiography is the most reliable method for confirming blood vessel compression. However, because it is invasive and cannot identify soft tissue and bone simultaneously, its cause is often unknown4). Also, electromyography has low sensitivity in neurogenic TOS. Existing 2-dimensional (D) CT has the disadvantage of showing only the transverse plane; however, 3D CT, which overcomes this, can observe bone and soft tissue more effectively through 3D reconstruction13). The 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography is currently the most commonly used modality to diagnose TOS and can effectively view the vessels and brachial plexus of the upper extremity5). The 3D nerve view delay with enhancement used in this case could detect nerve compression more effectively than the previous method, and the cause could be easily identified (Fig. 2C, D).
In neurogenic TOS, conservative treatment can be initially performed first11). Posture correction and weight control are helpful in addition to medication and physical therapy11). Ultrasonography-guided botulinum muscle injections can be attempted, and it has been reported that 69% of symptoms improve within a short period20).
Surgical treatment is considered when conservative care is ineffective, and functional disability occurs. There are three major surgical approaches for TOS: transaxillary, supraclavicular, and posterior approaches3,11). The most commonly used transaxillary approach has the advantage of completely exposing the first rib and a more cosmetic incision11). Because of this advantage, the neurovascular structure should not be retracted when removing the first rib9). However, incomplete exposure of the brachial plexus can cause iatrogenic damage19).
The supraclavicular approach is used to cut only the scalene muscle or remove the CR in patients with neurogenic TOS10). Although the supraclavicular approach has fewer cosmetic advantages than the transaxillary approach and is disadvantageous when removing the first rib, the middle and upper trunk of the brachial plexus are easily dissected, and the neck of the first and the anterior and middle scalene muscles are more visible. Because of these advantages, vascular reconstruction is possible10,11). Terzis and Kokkalis19) reported that the supraclavicular approach to remove CR had a good prognosis and fewer complications. However, the brachial plexus and vascular structures must be retracted to remove the first rib completely9). The complication rate of the transaxillary approach is 22.5%, and that of the supraclavicular approach is 12.6% to 25.9%22).
The posterior approach is often used in cases of previous anterior neck surgery and TOS recurrence. It also exposed the proximal portion of the brachial plexus. However, a large muscle dissection is required, and this impairs shoulder function18). In addition, exposure of the proximal part of the brachial plexus can damage the long thoracic, accessory, and dorsal scapular nerves18).

CONCLUSION

CR rarely causes symptoms; however, surgery should be performed if necessary. If surgery is considered, a supraclavicular approach that exposes the brachial plexus and surrounding structures is recommended. In addition, when using the supraclavicular approach, it would be helpful to understand the surrounding anatomy and refer to the repetitive surgical images.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
(A) The first X-ray image of the cervical rib. (B, C) Preoperative computed tomography angiography showed that the cervical rib was not compressing the artery and did not form an articulation.
nerve-2024-00654f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
(A, B) T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imaging with arrows demonstrating that the middle and inferior trunk of the right brachial plexus was compressed between the articulation site of the cervical rib and anterior scalene muscle. Edema was more severe than on the left side. (C, D) Enhanced 3-dimensional nerve view delay also shows compression and edema in the middle and inferior trunk of the brachial plexus.
nerve-2024-00654f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
In the surgical field (A) a supraclavicular incision was used. (B) After anterior scalenectomy, the long thoracic nerve, the upper and middle trunk of the brachial plexus, and the subclavian artery were identified. (C) The cervical rib was dissected after the retraction of the brachial plexus. SCM: sternocleidomastoid.
nerve-2024-00654f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Postoperative X-ray image with the cervical rib completely removed.
nerve-2024-00654f4.jpg

REFERENCES

1. Al-Hashel JY, El Shorbgy AA, Ahmed SF, Elshereef RR: Early versus late surgical treatment for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. ISRN Neurol 2013:673020, 2013
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Atasoy E: A hand surgeon's further experience with thoracic outlet compression syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 35:1528-1538, 2010
crossref pmid
3. Balci AE, Balci TA, Cakir O, Eren S, Eren MN: Surgical treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome: Effect and results of surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1091-1096, 2003
crossref pmid
4. Bogalho L, Seixas I, Martins JM, Pisco JM: Angiography in thoracic outlet syndrome. Acta Med Port 11:33-36, 1998
crossref pmid
5. Charon JP, Milne W, Sheppard DG, Houston JG: Evaluation of MR angiographic technique in the assessment of thoracic outlet syndrome. Clin Radiol 59:588-595, 2004
crossref pmid
6. Han S, Yildirim E, Dural K, Ozisik K, Yazkan R, Sakinci U: Transaxillary approach in thoracic outlet syndrome: The importance of resection of the first-rib. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:428-433, 2003
crossref pmid
7. Henry BM, Vikse J, Sanna B, Taterra D, Gomulska M, Pękala PA, et al.: Cervical rib prevalence and its association with thoracic outlet syndrome: A meta-analysis of 141 studies with surgical considerations. World Neurosurg 110:e965-e978, 2018
crossref pmid
8. Illig KA, Donahue D, Duncan A, Freischlag J, Gelabert H, Johansen K, et al.: Reporting standards of the society for vascular surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg 64:e23-35, 2016
crossref pmid
9. Karamustafaoglu YA, Yoruk Y, Tarladacalisir T, Kuzucuoglu M: Transaxillary approach for thoracic outlet syndrome: Results of surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 59:349-352, 2011
crossref pmid
10. Klaassen Z, Sorenson E, Tubbs RS, Arya R, Meloy P, Shah R, et al.: Thoracic outlet syndrome: A neurological and vascular disorder. Clin Anat 27:724-732, 2014
crossref pmid
11. Kuhn JE, Lebus VG, Bible JE: Thoracic outlet syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23:222-232, 2015
crossref pmid
12. Longley DG, Yedlicka JW, Molina EJ, Schwabacher S, Hunter DW, Letourneau JG: Thoracic outlet syndrome: Evaluation of the subclavian vessels by color duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:623-630, 1992
crossref pmid
13. Matsumura JS, Rilling WS, Pearce WH, Nemcek AA, Vogelzang RL, Yao JS: Helical computed tomography of the normal thoracic outlet. J Vasc Surg 26:776-783, 1997
crossref pmid
14. Morel J, Pirvu A, Elie A, Gallet N, Magne JL, Spear R: Functional results of cervical rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome: Impact on professional activity. Ann Vasc Surg 56:233-239, 2019
crossref pmid
15. Povlsen B, Hansson T, Povlsen SD: Treatment for thoracic outlet syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD007218, 2014
crossref pmid
16. Sanders RJ, Hammond SL, Rao NM: Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg 46:601-604, 2007
crossref pmid
17. Sheppard DG, Iyer RB, Fenstermacher MJ: Brachial plexus: Demonstration at US. Radiology 208:402-406, 1998
crossref pmid
18. Tender GC, Kline DG: Posterior subscapular approach to the brachial plexus. Neurosurgery 57:377-381, 2005
crossref pmid pdf
19. Terzis JK, Kokkalis ZT: Supraclavicular approach for thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand (N Y) 5:326-337, 2010
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Torriani M, Gupta R, Donahue DM: Botulinum toxin injection in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: results and experience using a ultrasound-guided approach. Skeletal Radiol 39:973-980, 2010
crossref pmid pdf
21. Tracci MC: Thoracic outlet syndrome: Transaxillary approach. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 16:267-277, 2011
crossref
22. Yin ZG, Gong KT, Zhang JB: Outcomes of surgical management of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: A systematic review and bayesian perspective. J Hand Surg Am 44:416.e1-416.e17, 2019
crossref pmid
Editorial Office
Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital
153, Gyeongchun-ro, Guri-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
TEL : +82-31-560-2325   E-mail: ryujeil@hanyang.ac.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Peripheral Nervous System.                 Developed in M2PI